Character of good research

Characteristics of Good Research Articles The following guidelines argon taken from a series of editorial viewpoints In Research every quarter for Exercise In Sport authored by Dry. Maureen Weiss (1 993, 1994, 1995). You should consider these your bible for assessing expressions you sympathise and for writing explore proposals and eventu solelyy, manuscripts for publication. If you follow these guidelines you will become a unwrap reader, writer, and reviewer of research 1. Introduction a. Is a theoretical or conceptual rationale provided for the convey? B. Is thither an adequate review and discussion of the given(p) empirical literature on the topic?Any key references omitted? C. Is there an explanation or justification for the selection of key variables in the study? D. Is there a logical progression and presentation of ideas that lead to the take aim of the present study? E. Do the hypotheses emanate logically from the theory and research presented? F. Is It specified how t he research question extends the current knowledge base In the research topic? 2. Method a. Is the sample exposit thoroughly (age, gender, readiness level, race, ethnicity) as well as the criteria for selection? B. Is the design clearly verbalise and Is it appropriate to the search questions?Are the relevant independent and dependent variables slight? C. Are the measures described adequately (validity, reliability, item and scoring format)? D. Are the procedures described completely and clearly enough so that they could be replicated by others? E. Is a route map provided for how the data are to be analyzed to consultation key study issues (e. G. , reliability of measures, each of the key research questions)? 3. Results a. Is the results sectionalisation readable? B. Are subheadings appropriately used to enhance readability and the road map? C.Are the appropriate statistics used to answer key study questions? D. Is all relevant Information associated with a particular statistic al procedure report? E. Are the statistical findings Interpreted accurately? 4. Discussion a. Is the study answer briefly recapped for the reader? B. Are the results summarized in relation to the study hypotheses (support, did non support)? C. Are the study results compared to pertinent studies mentioned in the introduction? D. Are theoretical implications provided? E. Are practical implications provided, if appropriate? F. Are future research directions adumbrate briefly? Is there a concluding paragraph that brings closure to the article by ensuring that readers get the take-home message? 5. Other Issues a. Is the manuscript create verbally clearly and understandably? B. Do all aspects of the manuscript conform to nipple style?