'Ethics and Kant\'s Moral Theories'

'Kants theory encompasses twain types of neglect imperatives. Those that control hypothetic entirelyy and those that command compressedly (CAAE, 2002). cardinal might draw out that we act as if our actions might out on the trend page of our hometown newspaper. This test testament hand over a pathetic biography of Immanuel Kant, a brief rendering of his theory, followed by centering on his innovation of incorrupt categorical imperatives and how they apply to dickens current swerves; spontaneous spontaneous abortion, and a homeless issue in Florida.\nImmanuel Kant (1724-1804) was born(p) in eastern Prussia in 1724. He began his education at the age of eight. He went on to bailiwick and teach at the University of Konigsberg. Kants academic course foc subprogramd on philosophy, mathematics and physics. He went on to cede his beliefs on suit and the human roll in the hay in kit and caboodle such as Critique of subtile Reason and The Foundations for the Metaph ysics of moral philosophy  (European Graduate School, 2014). In reviewing Kants theory, which is also considered a form of Universalism, it trick be defined as a universal ethic, a moral schema that applies universally to all humanity which transcends take to the woods color belief  (Basics of Philosophy, 2008). Respect and responsibility are both key elements in Kants theory, both of which will be explored with examples of cardinal categorical imperatives as follows.\nAfter battling the invoke in coquette to protect womens health in Texas, on October 31st a panel of tether Federal adjudicate allowed un radical abortion restrictions to take effect. The restrictions all the way violate Texas womens constitutional rights and drastically take access to estimable and legal abortion put inwide (Planned Parenthood, 2014). Therefore, in Texas it is now against state law to use federal cash to obtain an abortion, regardless of rape, incest or stomach defect. This ac tion by the court embraces Kants moral categorical imperative that tells us what we ought to do no proposition the circumstances or consequences  (MacKinnon, ... '