John Dourley and God Essay -- Religion Christianity Psychology Essays

outhouse Dourley and GodIt is my understanding that Dourley does non explain immortal as a creation of the human mind. Rather, the point that Dourley makes is that notions of god as be impertinent the psyche argon the result of archetypal expression of which the individual is unaware. This in no way eclipses the existence of god. Rather, it defies the orthodox notion of a transpsychic world by arguing that god is wholly contained in the psyche, albeit the limitless temperament of the unconscious mind. Dourley argues this in his discussion of Jungs arguments with Martin Buber. While Buber argues that such a beingness must be conceived as existing independently of the psyche (1995, p 181), Jung points out that Bubers conclusions are based on archetypal self-discipline of which Buber remained unaware (1995, p 183). The creation of a deity from encounters with archetypes as Buber had do is dubbed by Dourley as the deity-creating function of the unconscious, a term he uses twi ce (1995, p 177 199). Herein lies the possible misinterpretation that Dourley sees Jung as beholding god to be a human creation void of a earthly concern of existence. Dourley points out that religions that live do so because the founders individualised experience and imagery are recognized by the collective as meeting its ineluctably (1995, p177-8). Collective in this case refers to the collective unconscious. The unconscious resolves its needs by influencing individual consciousness, and invariably produces god-creations that partially satisfy its needs although not bringing total fulfillment. In this way, all the religions of the world are explained. To further illustrate how Dourleys concept of a deity-creating function does not relegate god to a mental creation, consider the ... ...ed life is keep up despite the law of entropy. I offer the arguments of changed consciousness and the idea of egress to show the reality of god beyond our mental creations. It is also principa l(prenominal) to note that both of these notions are premised on the idea of god existing inside the human psyche, not beyond it. It is my hope that my endeavors at the ascendant of the paper have that I am in agreement with Dourley, not opposition. Following my arguments to a logical end, I draw the conclusion that almost minds are, in fact, more receptive to the psychically contained god than are others. kit and boodle CitedDourley, John P. The religious implications of Jungs psychology. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 40. Halligan, Fredrica R. Jungian surmisal and religious experience. In RW Hood, Jr. (Ed) Handbook of religious experience. Birmingham Religious study Press, Inc.