Theatre of the 21st Century

? battlefield of the twenty-first Century should be feel frontward, non spirit back.\nDiscuss the above avouchment in relation to the exploit you drop seen in surgery and with reference to its captain motion circumstances.\n\nIn discussing the statement sign of the 21st Century should be looking at forward, not looking back, it is necessary to run across the statement from both a modern and historical sight to come to a conclusion. In this essay I result weigh up tag, lighting, acting and props and consider how these elements come to to the drudgery of Julius Caesar that I cut in the Donmar warehouse and how it compares to the accepted production in the globe. at bottom this essay I go forth also refer to the production at the Blackfriars indoor wendy house that was running simultaneously on board the globe. I will accordingly be able to stop whether athletic field is really looking forward in the 21st century. \nThe Set of the production I saw of Julius Caes ar was looking forward in terms of theatre. The set visualised the metatheatrical concept with a necessary naturalistic set. The die hard itself was set inside a womans prison, a location that itself is modern and did not exist during the original performance. An employment of how this was evident is with the use of the wide-cut room being a dull grade shade. The entrances and exits were snappy grey alloy doors that clanged when they were closed, this delineated that the entire auditorium was a prison not just the symbolize area. The use of grey metal poles around the stage and low temperature grey flooring depicted the interior to a cell. The agreement the director, Phyllida Lloyd, did this was to show her concept and to run a difficult text more accessible done modernising the production and making it relatable for the audience. This shows that the theatre is looking forward as such a backing in itself would not have been heard of in the original performance circumst ances. However, you could also beg that even t...